Differences between NIH and non-NIH phenotypes of PCOS: A pilot study exploring anxiety and various aspects of self-esteem
More details
Hide details
1
1. Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Psychotherapy, Lenartowicza 14, 31-138 Kraków, Poland.
2. Joseph Babiński Clinical Hospital, Babińskiego 29, 30-393 Kraków, Poland
2
1. Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Kopernika 21A, 31-501 Kraków, Poland
2. Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Psychotherapy, Lenartowicza 14, 31-138 Kraków, Poland.
3
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Psychotherapy, Lenartowicza 14, 31-138 Kraków, Poland.
4
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kopernika Street 23, 31-501 Kraków, Poland
Submission date: 2025-07-08
Final revision date: 2026-02-18
Acceptance date: 2026-02-23
Online publication date: 2026-04-13
Publication date: 2026-04-13
Corresponding author
Witold Urban
1. Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Psychotherapy, Lenartowicza 14, 31-138 Kraków, Poland.
2. Joseph Babiński Clinical Hospital, Babińskiego 29, 30-393 Kraków, Poland
Arch Psych Psych 2026;28(1):22-31
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim of the study:
To assess whether patients with NIH phenotypes of PCOS differ from those with non-NIH phenotypes in terms of trait-anxiety, state-anxiety and self-esteem. Additionally, we decided to investigate the variables influencing the sense of physical attractiveness in both study groups.
Subject or material and methods:
49 patients with NIH phenotypes of PCOS and 27 patients with non-NIH phenotypes were enrolled into the study. Each patient underwent gynecological and endocrinological diagnostics. For psychological evaluation we used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Inventory.
Results:
Patients with NIH phenotypes presented higher scores in trait-anxiety (p=0,021). The groups did not differ in global self-esteem. However, patients with NIH phenotypes presented lower scores on the identity integration (p=0,010) and body appearance (p=0,033) scales. NIH patients also presented lower scores on the lovability (p=0,053) and competence (p=0,050) scales; nevertheless, these findings approached statistical significance. In the NIH group, trait-anxiety (β= -0,428, p=0,001) and BMI (β= -0,345, p=0,009) were statistically significant negative predictors of the sense of physical attractiveness, while in the non-NIH group only trait-anxiety (β= -0,670, p<0,001) was found to be a negative predictor of this aspect of self-esteem.
Discussion:
Patients with NIH phenotypes of PCOS presented higher scores in trait-anxiety, and lower scores in some aspects of self-esteem. These differences may stem, at least in part, from the more pronounced symptomatology among patients with NIH phenotypes.
Conclusions:
Differences in self-esteem and anxiety among patients with different PCOS phenotypes should guide development of more personalized treatment programs.