ARTICLE
A multi-criteria decision-making approach for schizophrenia treatment techniques
 
More details
Hide details
1
Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China & Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Near East University Nicosia, Mersin 10 TRNC, 99138 Turkey
 
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Near East University Nicosia, Mersin 10 TRNC, 99138 Turkey
 
3
Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology & Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China
 
 
Submission date: 2019-03-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2019-07-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-08-07
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-06-25
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-25
 
 
Corresponding author
Ilker Ozsahin   

Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China & Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Near East University Nicosia, Mersin 10 TRNC, 99138 Turkey
 
 
Arch Psych Psych 2020;22(2):52-61
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim of the study:
There are different schizophrenia treatment approaches used to manage the disorder. The objective of this study is to show that the multi-criteria decision-making approach can be applied for selecting the most appropriate schizophrenia treatment. We propose the use of the fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) technique for evaluating and comparing schizophrenia treatment techniques.

Subject or material and methods:
The most commonly used therapy techniques for schizophrenia, namely pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducation program, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroconvulsive therapy were selected. The side effects, efficacy, time of treatment, cost of treatment, and comfort level were used as the criteria for the analysis. Criteria weights and preference function were used while computing the difference of alternatives contribution. After defining the values of each criteria, we set the weights and the preference function, and finally obtained the results with the Decision Lab program for two different cases: high importance is given to the efficacy, side effects, and patient comfort; the same level of importance is given to all criteria.

Results:
The results show that pharmacotherapy is the most preferred technique in both cases, while other techniques have different stages in the complete ranking based on the assigned weights.

Discussion:
One can easily adapt more treatment techniques and criteria and assign their weights based on a specific patient profile.

Conclusions:
he proposed technique for the decision-making process is an important tool that can be considered by clinicians as well as patients/families in selecting the most appropriate treatment technique.

eISSN:2083-828X
ISSN:1509-2046
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top